These are my next requests. Please, check my grammar if there are some mistakes in my sentences.
1. Kalimat had as a main verb, benarkah seperti ini:
I had been a carpenter two years ago before I built a new house.
2. Kalimat had as an auxiliary verb
I had seen a sunset at marina beach before I went to my village.
3. Kalau kalimatnya, “dia menikahi saya“, benarkah grammarnya kalau ditulis:
He is marry me/ He marries me or he marry me?
Shusy-po
ANSWER:
Dalam perfect tenses (e.g. present perfect, past perfect, future perfect, dst), have/has dan had adalah auxiliary verb.
S + have/has + verb3…
S + have/has + been + verbing…
S + had + verb3…
S + had + been + verbing…
S + will + have + verb3…
S + would + have + verb3… dst
Contoh:
- I had been a carpenter for two years before I built a new house.
- I had seen a sunset at Marina beach before I went to my village.
Di kedua kalimat ini had adalah auxiliary verb, sedangkan main verbnya berturut-turut adalah been dan seen.
Tapi di kedua kalimat berikut, had yang kedua adalah main verb, sedangkan yang di depannya adalah auxiliary.
- I had had my homework done before I submitted it. (PRku telah selesai dikerjakan (oleh orang lain yang aku suruh) sebelum aku menyetornya).
- She had had a car before I bought mine. (Dia telah punya sebuah mobil sebelum aku membeli mobilku).
3. Kalimatnya lebih tepat kalau dinyatakan dalam past tense: “He married me“, karena action “menikahi” sudah in the past. Tapi kalau ingin menyatakan bahwa status “he” adalah kawin dengan saya, maka “He is married to/with me“. Yes, dinyatakan dalam simple present tense karena status perkawinannya masih berlangsung sampai sekarang dan mungkin sampai selamanya.
NOTE: Di kalimat1 tidak perlu ada ago , dan perlu for agar sesuai dengan tensisnya. Kalau for dan ago ditiadakan, maka sebaiknya dalam past tense: “I was a carpenter two years before I built a new house.
