Pola untuk Past Future Tense adalah sebagai berikut:
| Subject + would + verb1+ object + modifier |
| Subject + [(was/were) going to] + verb1+ object + modifier |
Contoh:
- Farmers in Jati Bali would grow rice crops last month. (Petani-petani di Jati Bali akan bercocok tanam padi bulan lalu).
- Some students would conduct research on vegetative plant propagations last semester. (Beberapa siswa akan melakukan penelitian pada perbanyakan tanaman vegetatif semester lalu).
- Transpiration would start to increase at 8 a.m. this morning. (Transpirasi akan mulai meningkat jam 8 tadi pagi).
Penggunaan Past Future Tense
Pada prinsipnya, past future tense mirip dengan simple future tense dan ketentuan-ketentuan yang berlaku pada simple future tense umumnya juga berlaku pada past future tense. Tetapi, karena bergulirnya waktu, simple future tense bergeser dari future time ke past time menjadi past future tense. Untuk menjelaskan ini, di sini akan digunakan konsep dan contoh-contoh pada future tense.
Past Future Tense, seperti halnya simple future tense, dapat digunakan dalam 5 kategori, yaitu:
1. Untuk menyatakan kembali kejadian/aktivitas yang pernah diprediksi akan terjadi/dilakukan pada saat tertentu di masa lampau.
Untuk memahami perbedaann past future tense dengan simple future tense, mari kita perhatikan contoh-contoh kalimat yang diberikan pada simple future tense berikut ini:
- According to the weather forecast, it will rain tomorrow. (Menurut ramalam cuaca, hujan akan turun besok).
- None of us have done the homework the teacher told us to do. He will be very disappointed when he finds out.
- Ronny is going to come to my house at 7 o’clock tonight. I think Jeny, Ronny’s girlfriend, will come too.
- I will probably see Janet at the cafeteria at lunch.
- The damage we do to our forest today will result in severe catastrophes sooner or later in the future.
Perhatikan contoh 1 di atas dan anggap saja sekarang adalah tanggal 2 Mei!
- According to the weather forecast, it will rain tomorrow. (Menurut ramalam cuaca, hujan akan turun besok).
Dalam bahasa Indonesia, kalimat ini juga berarti:
- Menurut ramalan cuaca, hujan akan turun tanggal 3 Mei.
Kemudian, karena waktu terus bergulir, anggap sekarang sudah tanggal 4 Mei. Berarti, yang diprediksi tadi (i.e. hujan akan turun) sudah dalam past time, yaitu “kemarin”. Jadi prediksi tadi harus dinyatakan dalam past future tense menjadi:
- According to the weather forecast, it would rain yesterday. Atau, According to the weather forecast, it was going to rain yesterday. Dan begitu juga dengan kalimat-kalimat 2-5 di atas seiring dengan bergulirnya waktu berturut-turut akan menjadi:
- We thought that he would be very disappointed when we didn’t do the homework two days ago. Atau, We thought that he was going to be very disappointed when we didn’t do the homework two days ago.
- Ronny came to my house at 7 p.m. two days ago. I thought Jeny, Ronny’s girlfriend, would come too but she didn’t. Atau, I thought Jeny, Ronny’s girlfriend, was going to come too but she didn’t.
- I would probably see Janet at the cafeteria at lunch. Atau, I was probably going to see Janet at the cafeteria at lunch.
- The damage we do to our forest today will result in severe catastrophes sooner or later in the future.
Note: Jika yang diprediksi pada saat pengungkapan kembali masih in future time, (dalam analogi di atas, masih belum tanggal 4 Mei), tetap gunakan simple future tense. (Lihat contoh 5 di atas dan contoh 4 di bawah).
2. Untuk menyatakan kembali kejadian/aktivitas yang direncanakan akan terjadi/dilakukan pada saat tertentu di masa lampau.
Dengan menggunakan analogi pada kategori 1, kalimat dalam simple future tense berikut:
- Ronny is going to come to my house at 7 o’clock tonight.
- He has an appointment. He is going to meet his business partner at noon.
- I am going to go to the shopping. Do you want to go with me?
- The next world cup championship is going to be held in South Africa in 2010.
- He is going to leave for Bali tomorrow morning.
seiring dengan berulirnya waktu akan dinyatakan dalam past future tense menjadi:
- Ronny was going to come to my house at 7 p.m. two days ago but he couldn’t come because of the pouring rain. Atau, Ronny would come to my house at 7 p.m. two days ago but he couldn’t come because of the pouring rain.
- He was going to meet his business partner at noon two days ago but he suddenly got sick just half an hour before the meeting. Atau, He would meet his business partner at noon two days ago but he suddenly got sick just half an hour before the meeting.
- I was going to go to the shopping mall when I asked whether you wanted to go with me two days ago. Atau, I would go to the shopping mall when I asked whether you wanted to go with me two days ago.
- The next world cup championship is going to be held in South Africa in 2010. Kalimat ini tidak berubah karena aktivitas dari yang direncanakan masih akan dilakukan tahun depan.
- He was going to leave for Bali yesterday morning but the flight was cancelled. Atau, He would leave for Bali yesterday morning but the flight was cancelled.
Note: a). Dalam past future tense, pola yang pertama juga bisa digunakan untuk menyatakan rencana. b). Jika yang direncanakan itu terjadi/dilakukan, maknanya sudah berubah menjadi kejadian/aktivitas yang terjadi in the past (past tense) atau sedang berlangsung in the past (past continuous tense), tergantung keterangan waktunya.
- Ronny was being at my house at 7 p.m. two days ago. (Ronny sedang di rumah saya jam 7 malam 2 hari lalu).
- He was meeting his business partner at noon two days ago. (Dia sedang meeting dengan rekan bisnisnya jam 12 siang dua hari lalu).
- I went to the shopping mall two days ago. (Saya pergi ke shopping mall 2 hari lalu).
- He left for Bali yesterday morning. (Dia berangkat ke Bali kemarin pagi).
3. Untuk membuat main clause unreal conditionals tipe 1, yaitu conditional yang faktanya dalam simple present tense atau simple future tense.
- If I were you, I would study harder. (Jika saya adalah kamu, saya akan belajar lebih giat).
- The crops would not fail to produce if the rain fell. (Tanaman-tanaman tidak akan gagal berproduksi jika hujan turun).
- They would not need to lime the soil if it were not acidic. (Mereka tidak akan perlu mengapur tanah jika tanah tersebut tidak masam).
4. Untuk membuat kalimat tak langsung (indirect speech), jika kalimat langsungnya menggunakan simple future tense.
Contoh:
- My boyfriend told me that he would marry me. (Pacar saya berkata kepada saya bahwa dia akan mengawini saya).
- An agronomist said that the soil would be more productive if we fertilized it. (Seorang ahli agronomi bilang bahwa tanah akan lebih produktif jika kita memupuknya).
- Dean made an announcement that the final exams would be started in two weeks. (Dekan mengumumkan bahwa ujian-ujian akhir akan dimulai dua minggu mendatang).
5. Untuk membuat request atau command menjadi lebih formal atau lebih sopan. Note: would lebih formal/sopan dibandingkan will.
Contoh:
- Would you turn down the TV volume, please! It’s too loud. (Tolong kecilkan volume TV. Volumenya terlalu keras).
- I didn’t go to school yesterday, so would you please lend me your note? (Saya tidak sekolah kemarin. Tolong pinjami saya catatan kamu?).
- If you’re free, would you go to see a movie with me tonight? (Jika kamu tidak sibuk, maukah kamu nonton film dengan saya malam ini?).
Negative Form
Bentuk negatif Past Future Tense adalah dengan menambahkan not seelah would atau setelah be (was/were) seperti terlihat pada pola berikut:
| Subject + would + not + verb1+ object + modifier |
| Subject + [(was/were) + not + going to] + verb1+ object + modifier |
Contoh:
- According to the weather forecast, it would not rain yesterday.
- We thought that he wouldn’t be very happy when we didn’t do the homework.
- Ronny came to my house at 7 p.m. two days ago. I thought Jeny, Ronny’s girlfriend, wouldn’t come but she did.
- I wouldn’t probably see Janet at the cafeteria at lunch.
- Ronny wasn’t going to come to my house at 7 p.m. two days ago.
- He wasn’t going to meet his business partner at noon two days ago.
- I wasn’t going to go to the shopping when I met you two days ago.
- He wasn’t going to leave for Bali yesterday morning
Yes/No Questions
Yes/No Questions untuk Past Future Tense adalah sebagai berikut:
| Would + subject + verb1+ object + modifier? |
| (Was/Were) + subject + going to + verb1+ object + modifier? |
Contoh:
- According to the weather forecast, would it rain yesterday? atau According to the weather forecast, was it going to rain yesterday?.
- Would Jeny, Ronny’s girlfriend, come too?
- Would you probably see Janet at the cafeteria at lunch two days ago?
- Was Ronny not going to come to your house at 7 p.m. two days ago?
- Was he going to meet his business partner at noon two days ago?
- Were you going to go to the shopping when you asked whether I wanted to go with you two days ago?
- Was he going to leave for Bali yesterday morning?


8 comments
jojo_kasmujiraharjo
May 2, 2010
It’s a very typical traditional Indonesian tenses explanation. As far as I know there is no combination between future and past. How can it be? Let’s take an example of what you call “past future tense”
*It would rain on the 3rd May, from the original sentence ‘According to weather forecast, it will rain on the 3rd of May.’
It is just a simple past. You cannot change the sentence (meaning) into past until the fourth of May. If you change into what you call the past future it is just a change of form because it has not happened yet. So the sentence of “It would rain on the 3rd of May” is meaningless. Thank you!!
Swara Bhaskara
May 3, 2010
Hi Jojo,
First of all, I’d like to thank you for commenting. I really appreciate it. However, please be gentler! Don’t let yourself get infected by the way some, if not all, the honorable legislative members speak or by those we have often seen on TV recently! We are losing how to appreciate or how to respect one another. I really wish you were not among them.
If I am not mistaken, your comment mainly emphasizes the term I use and the simple past tense vs the past future tense.
Forgive me if I use the term “Past future tense” for “Future in the past” or for you might call it “Conditional simple” or else. The term is not mine. I borrowed it from my traditional junior high school English teacher because I found it easier to recall and compare its pattern to that of, for instance, the “simple future tense”. Therefore, I hope it will do the same to the blog’s visitors. Besides, in many parts of this blog, I have repeatedly suggested that terms not be our main concern in learning how to write or speak in English.
As for the simple past tense vs the past future tense, in my understanding, which is still not much, the usage of these two tenses has different context. Among others, the past future tense is used to express or to restate the predictions or plans that have been made before.
In “It would rain on the 3rd OF May”, the sentence restates the prediction, “It will rain on the 3rd of May” that was stated prior to the 3rd of May, for instance, on May 2nd. This sentence doesn’t imply what actually happened on May 3rd. Whether “It rained” or “It didn’t rain” is not the main concern of this sentence.
If we want to express how the predictions (or plans) came out or what actually happened, then we should use the simple past tense.
The forecast was correct. It rained on the 3rd of May.
Or,
The forecast was incorrect. It didn’t rain on the 3rd of May.
Btw, I heard a similar context when I was watching the Real Madrid vs Osasuna match early this morning. The score was still 2 all. Probably because the Real kept attacking, the commentator said, “Sooner or later, Real Madrid will score“. Later on, his prediction came true. Several minutes before the match was over, Christian Ronaldo’s heading scored. The commentator said, “I had the feeling it would happen.”
NOTE:
1. If you had read my explanation given prior to the example in question a little bit more thoroughly, your disagreement might not have emerged. Actually, it is assumed that the sentence “It would rain on the 3rd of May” is spoken on May 4”.
2. It’s not always the case that the time for past future tense has already passed into the past time. This occurs when we change the direct speech in the simple future tense into its corresponding indirect speech.
For example,
Ani: “I will go to Bali next month.”
Andi: “What did Ani just say, Andre?”
Andrea: “Ani said that she would go to Bali next month“.
This also occurs when we express future actions or happenings that surely contrary to expectation.
For example,
I will not be able to meet my girl friend this weekend. I wish I would be able to meet my girl friend this weekend.
.
Restyreswary
May 12, 2010
Wow, seru banget.
Biasanya pak Bhaskara memberi koreksi tulisan, kok di sini tidak ya? Dari tulisan mas jojo dan tanggapan pak Bhaskara, yang ingin aku tanyakan, mana yang benar :
1. tenses explanation atau tense explanation ? menurut aku sih yang kedua.
2. 3rd May atau 3rd of May? Bapak juga menggunakan May 3rd dan May 4 (tanpa th). Apa dibenarkan tanpa th, dan kenapa tidak konsinten dengan satu pola saja, misalnya 3rd May atau 3rd of May?
3. you were not among them atau you are not among them? Kenapa pake were? kenapa tidak pake are?
4. what you call “past future tense” atau what you call it “past future tense”?. menurutku it tidak diperlukan karena “call” sudah ada objeknya yaitu “past future tense”.
tq
Swara Bhaskara
May 12, 2010
Good questions, Resty.
Mungkin pak Jojo atau yang lain bersedia meluangkan waktu untuk memberi tanggapan?
raja_rondo
May 4, 2010
u are the best lah”pak bas pokokna
hari gini mana ada orang yg ngajrin b.inggris gratis n menyenangkan,kalo nggak pak baskara,,
two thumbs up for Mr.bhaskara
endru
September 21, 2010
Tanggapan untuk Jojo:
Future in the Past is used to express the idea that in the past you thought something would happen in the future. It does not matter if you are correct or not. Future in the Past follows the same basic rules as the Simple Future. “Would” is used to volunteer or promise, and “was going to” is used to plan. Moreover, both forms can be used to make predictions about the future.
Examples:
* I told you he was going to come to the party. plan
* I knew Julie would make dinner. voluntary action
Tanggapan untuk Resty:
You write: 1st January.
You read: the first of January.
I love you all,
endru
Swara Bhaskara
October 13, 2010
Thanks Endru for commenting.
I just would like to add what Endru said to Resty.
1. tenses explanation atau tense explanation ?
It should be the latter. Please check Penggunaan Nouns sebagai Adjectives.
2. Endru’s right. All of the variants I used for stating a date above are acceptable. I wrote them interchangeably just to avoid writing the same phrase repeatedly.
3. Kenapa pake were bukan are?
Because such a sentence is a contrary to fact conditional.
4. Yes, you’re right. The pronoun “it” is not needed in “..what you call “past future tense”..”. However, it is needed in, “..for you might call it “Conditional simple” ..”. Here, I was referring “it” to “past future tense“. Another example is as follows,
Dalam Bahasa Indonesia, kita menyebut “jari kita yang paling besar” dengan “ibu jari”, but in English, we call it a thumb.
loc
December 8, 2010
I agree with jojo, I’m afraid. All this BS about the English language having something like 16 TENSES is just a twisted idea concocted by some Indonesian teacher/writer who proclaimed themselves to be an authority in the English grammar, with no basis whatsoever in the works of the real, authoritative linguists. I’m Indonesian, by the way, and I’m an English teacher/trainer so I know what I’m talking about.
It’s not as simple as dismissing it as “it’s just a term; you can call it whatever you want”. The word ‘tense’ is not just ‘a term’. The use of the word has grammatical and linguistic implications. ‘Tense’ is not ‘time’, and they’re not interchangeable. You can express futurity/future time in the past, yes. However, it is by no means a ‘tense’. Do have a read of the following books by leading figures in English linguistics/grammar (‘leading’ as in real experts who did their research before writing their books, are acknowledged by their peers, and get cited/quoted/referred to a lot):
* Eckersleys’ A Comprehensive English Grammar
* Swan’s Practical English Usage
* Thomson & Martinet’s A Practical English Grammar
* Crystal’s The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language
* Quirk/Greenbaum/Leech/Svartvik’s A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
Perhaps they might help you see that:
1. The word ‘tense’ does have a specific definition and use.
2. There is no such thing as the ‘Past Future Tense’.
Don’t confuse the students please. They deserve better. Make learning English effortless (which means not having to memorize 16 tenses, among others) and enjoyable for them.